Battle for the throne
In this interesting article, Dr.
Akinola, a scholar and political analyst, based in the UK, examines the various
odds in favour of the APC Presidential candidate Maj. Gen M. Buhari (retd) in
the Feb. 14th presidential election.
Read it after the cut…
The one picture you would hate to
see in your dreams is that of the very opponent of the team you are supporting,
clutching a massive trophy and jubilating all over the place! Not just once had
one experienced a ‘nightmarish’ dream of this nature and not just once had
‘Joseph the Octopus’ proved to be revealing exactly what was about to happen.
Of course, it should not be
interpreted as if one does not want Maj. Gen. Muhammadu Buhari to be the next
president of the Federal Republic of Nigeria but what the hell was he doing in
my dream smiling so broadly as he acknowledged shouts of ‘congratulations’ from
a horde of adoring supporters? The man can hardly manage a smile in real life
and neither is he the candidate one would ordinarily be rooting for. However, a
warning would seem to have come from the unknown: ‘Do not bet your house
against Buhari becoming (the next) president unless you are equally prepared to
be homeless!”
The above extracts are from an
article I wrote (title retained) in the run-up to the 2011 presidential
election, having dreamt that Maj. Gen Muhammadu Buhari won the election. Of
course, he did not but, who knows, it could have been a distant event that one
had foreseen!
In trying to rationalise the
circumstances that could have made it a dream-come-true for Buhari, I examined
the controversy that surrounded the candidacy of President Goodluck Jonathan
over the zoning philosophy of his party, the Peoples Democratic Party. That
controversy, more or less, pitted the northern leadership against him. I also
examined the possibility that the then so-called progressive parties might
actually co-operate among themselves in order to counterbalance the influence and
power of the PDP. An attempt made in that direction did not succeed.
Quite a lot has changed since
2011 and the aforementioned factors, more than ever before, will have
implications for the direction of the Presidency come February 14.
Firstly, the once splinter
progressive parties have coalesced into the All Progressives Congress, thanks
to the centralising influence of the institution of the Presidency. The
February presidential election will be fought in what is a two-party
competition between the PDP and the APC. Buhari could be the beneficiary of
this new development, as he now competes for the Presidency under the platform
of a political party which, unlike his defunct Congress for Political Change,
enjoys nationwide support.
Secondly, the February elections
will reveal the extent to which the intra-party crisis in the PDP – a crisis
which led to the defection of five of its governors to the rival APC – has
resulted into the loss or gain of popular support in the various
constituencies. I have attempted to explain the causes of the crisis in the PDP
by three factors: “One, a frosty relationship between President Goodluck
Jonathan and Governor Rotimi Amaechi of Rivers State; two, an allegation of
arbitrariness on the part of the immediate past PDP national chairman, Alhaji
Bamanga Tukur; and three, the perceived ambition of President Jonathan to seek
re-election in 2015 in contradiction of a supposed agreement that he would not
be doing so.” (see my book, Party Coalitions in Nigeria (2014), pp. 129-130).
Cleavage, be it of ethnicity or
religion, is the worst of political problems. You hardly can resolve the
problem of cleavage by preaching to people to forget about those things they
hold very dear to their hearts. There are not a few in the North who feel the
South had dominated the Presidency for the greater part of the current
Republic; they will grab the opportunity provided by the candidacy of Muhammadu
Buhari in ensuring that the pendulum of political power swings back to their
region.
Finally, Buhari faces an
incumbent President, Goodluck Jonathan, who may be having problems with
economic and security issues. Allegations of escalating official corruption and
Boko Haram insurgency in the North-East may have overshadowed the modest
achievements of Jonathan. Of course, diverse sentiments will compete and
contend in the 2015 election, but there are not a few who would want to reward
or punish him on their perception of his stewardship during the past four
years. Buhari, himself a former leader, has his own “baggages” but he enjoys
the perception of being one disciplined individual who passionately resents
corruption. Corruption has been that most deadly virus afflicting the Nigerian
state.
There is hardly any doubt that
the days ahead will be quite interesting. What we must continue to do is to
educate our people about the ramifications of democracy as a game where the
minority must have its say while the majority has its way. Why, for instance,
would you want to throw the nation into chaos just because someone has lost an
election, even when another member of your ethnic or religious constituency
could be a beneficiary in the near future? Why would you want the stigma of
“intolerant democrats” stamped permanently on you and your people? Our nation
must unite behind whoever wins the February presidential election.
Dr. Akinola, a scholar and
political analyst, wrote in from Oxford, United Kingdom

Oya na, letz see how it goes. GEJ all the way....he's the popular choice not a regional choice
ReplyDeleteGEJ is stil the man to win. He's goy no substitute....no leader has performed more than him this dispensation. Truth be told...
ReplyDelete